SURESH vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 699/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section reopen. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010010572026
Filing Number
811/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
699/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURESH
Adv. BALU V
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed accused A6's petition to reopen the defence stage and call for case diary records in a custodial death case. A6 claims he was on special team duty during the relevant period (15-18 June 2015) and seeks official records to prove he was not at the place of occurrence. Though the prosecution argued reopening at the argument stage is impermissible and amounts to filling gaps in the defence, the court held that the documents are relevant to A6's specific defence and necessary for proper adjudication, prioritizing the search for truth over procedural delay concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed accused A6's petition to reopen the defence stage and call for case diary records in a custodial death case. A6 claims he was on special team duty during the relevant period (15-18 June 2015) and seeks official records to prove he was not at the place of occurrence. Though the prosecution argued reopening at the argument stage is impermissible and amounts to filling gaps in the defence, the court held that the documents are relevant to A6's specific defence and necessary for proper adjudication, prioritizing the search for truth over procedural delay concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts