THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION PS, VELLORE vs A. SHAMSHAT — 436/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010006952026
Filing Number
520/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
436/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION PS (Police Station), VELLORE
Adv. PARTHIBAN M M
Respondent(s)
-
1.A. SHAMSHAT
-
2.A. AYUBALI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Vellore Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act allowed the prosecution's petition to recall witness PW-3 Lokesh and permit cross-examination by the prosecution. The court found that despite the petition being filed at a late stage (after prosecution evidence closed), recalling the witness was necessary for a just decision since PW-3 gave testimony inconsistent with his earlier police statement regarding demands and acceptance of illegal gratification in a corruption case. The court invoked its wide powers under Section 311 CrPC, citing Supreme Court precedents that authorize such recalls to arrive at truth and secure justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
25-Feb-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
18-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
11-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 436/2026
Summary The Vellore Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act allowed the prosecution's petition to recall witness PW-3 Lokesh and permit cross-examination by the prosecution. The court found that despite the petition being filed at a late stage (after prosecution evidence closed), recalling the witness was necessary for a just decision since PW-3 gave testimony inconsistent with his earlier police statement regarding demands and acceptance of illegal gratification in a corruption case. The court invoked its wide powers under Section 311 CrPC, citing Supreme Court precedents that authorize such recalls to arrive at truth and secure justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts