DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THIRUVARUR vs MANOHARAN — 3/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),318(2),69,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case

CNR: TNTV160002342025

e-Filing Number

27-11-2025

Filing Number

234/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

Special Court for the exclusive trial of SC and ST Cases, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

ALL WOMEN P.S. , TIRUVARUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),318(2),69,351(3)
Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THIRUVARUR

    Adv. Inspector Police AWPS TIRUVARUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOHARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Spl.SC.No.03/2026 Court Decision: The Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) in Thiruvarur acquitted defendant Manoharan of all charges. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accusations under IPC Section 69 read with SC/ST (PoA) Act Sections 3(2)(va), 3(1)(s), and IPC Section 351(3). Key Reasoning: Although the complainant (a Dalit woman) alleged the defendant sexually exploited her under false marriage promises and later harassed her using caste slurs, her testimony was contradicted by medical evidence, her own written complaint, and subsequent registered marriage documents showing consensual union. The court determined the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  10. 07-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Framing of Charges

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Spl.SC.No.03/2026 Court Decision: The Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) in Thiruvarur acquitted defendant Manoharan of all charges. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accusations under IPC Section 69 read with SC/ST (PoA) Act Sections 3(2)(va), 3(1)(s), and IPC Section 351(3). Key Reasoning: Although the complainant (a Dalit woman) alleged the defendant sexually exploited her under false marriage promises and later harassed her using caste slurs, her testimony was contradicted by medical evidence, her own written complaint, and subsequent registered marriage documents showing consensual union. The court determined the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case