DEPUTY SUPIRENDENT OF POLICE, NANNILAM SUB DIVISION vs HARIHARAN — 62/2025

Case under Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case

CNR: TNTV160000622025

e-Filing Number

28-02-2025

Filing Number

62/2025

Filing Date

20-Mar-2025

Registration No

62/2025

Registration Date

20-Mar-2025

Court

Special Court for the exclusive trial of SC and ST Cases, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY SUPIRENDENT OF POLICE, NANNILAM SUB DIVISION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARIHARAN

  2. 2.MUKESH

  3. 3.SIVARAM

  4. 4.SURYAPRAKASH

  5. 5.DHIVAKAR

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Judgement

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  3. 21-May-2026

    Arguments

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  4. 11-May-2026

    Arguments

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 62/2025 Summary: This is a witness examination proceeding under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, heard before the Special Court in Tiruvarur on March 7, 2026. Police Constable Subramaniyam (witness) testified regarding an FIR filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nannilam against respondents Hariharan, Mukesh, and Sivaram. During cross-examination, discrepancies emerged in the FIR preparation—the complaint was recorded on January 4, 2025 at 1:30 PM but the receipt was issued on January 1, 2025 at 6:10 PM, and the witness acknowledged a 4-day delay in preparing the FIR. The witness testified that the case was filed without visiting the crime scene or properly examining witnesses. The court recorded the witness's sworn statement, which was read back and verified by the witness before the judge on the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 05-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  18. 21-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  19. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  20. 02-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 02-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 02-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  23. 16-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 16-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  25. 04-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  26. 04-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  27. 24-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  28. 24-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  29. 10-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 10-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  31. 10-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  32. 16-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  33. 16-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  34. 16-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  35. 26-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  36. 26-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  37. 11-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  38. 11-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  39. 11-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  40. 22-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  41. 13-Aug-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Sessions Judge Special Court for trail of cases under SC and ST Poa Act

  42. 22-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 20-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 62/2025 Summary: This is a witness examination proceeding under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, heard before the Special Court in Tiruvarur on March 7, 2026. Police Constable Subramaniyam (witness) testified regarding an FIR filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nannilam against respondents Hariharan, Mukesh, and Sivaram. During cross-examination, discrepancies emerged in the FIR preparation—the complaint was recorded on January 4, 2025 at 1:30 PM but the receipt was issued on January 1, 2025 at 6:10 PM, and the witness acknowledged a 4-day delay in preparing the FIR. The witness testified that the case was filed without visiting the crime scene or properly examining witnesses. The court recorded the witness's sworn statement, which was read back and verified by the witness before the judge on the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case