STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs JEGATHEESAN — 349/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 386, 506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV150014702025

e-Filing Number

05-12-2025

Filing Number

1368/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

349/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

334

Police Station

KODAVASAL P.S

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 386, 506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JEGATHEESAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 349/2025 Decision: The District Magistrate-cum-Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused R. Jagadeesan under IPC Sections 386 (extortion) and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), invoking the benefit of doubt and discharging him under CrPC Section 248(1). Key Reasoning: While the complainant testified to a nighttime robbery involving threats with a knife and extortion of ₹600 on July 10, 2023, his court testimony materially contradicted his original complaint regarding dates, times, and circumstances. The investigating officer's evidence (PW4) and supporting documents became vulnerable to challenge without corroborating witness testimony, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability despite recovery of the alleged weapon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  4. 26-May-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 25-May-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  6. 22-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 22-May-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  8. 20-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 20-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 20-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  11. 14-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 14-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  13. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  14. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  15. 21-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  16. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  17. 16-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  18. 02-Apr-2026

    Service Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  19. 23-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  20. 11-Mar-2026

    Copies

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  21. 26-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  22. 26-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 349/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 349/2025 Decision: The District Magistrate-cum-Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused R. Jagadeesan under IPC Sections 386 (extortion) and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), invoking the benefit of doubt and discharging him under CrPC Section 248(1). Key Reasoning: While the complainant testified to a nighttime robbery involving threats with a knife and extortion of ₹600 on July 10, 2023, his court testimony materially contradicted his original complaint regarding dates, times, and circumstances. The investigating officer's evidence (PW4) and supporting documents became vulnerable to challenge without corroborating witness testimony, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability despite recovery of the alleged weapon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case