STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs SHANMUGASUNDRAM — 309/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(aaa). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTV150013702025

e-Filing Number

24-10-2025

Filing Number

1270/2025

Filing Date

05-Nov-2025

Registration No

309/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1000

Police Station

KODAVASAL P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(aaa)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANMUGASUNDRAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  3. 20-May-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-May-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 12-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 12-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.309/2025 This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) in a liquor prohibition case against Shanmugasundram. On October 16, 2021, police seized 110 liters of illicit liquor near Manjakkudi and arrested the accused, who allegedly had no authorization to possess it. The prosecution witness (a constable) testified about the seizure, arrest at 10:30 AM, and destruction of the contraband at 11:15 AM under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, Section 4(1)(aaa). During cross-examination, the defense disputed the timeline, legality of the arrest, and the witness's credibility, but the magistrate admitted the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 12-May-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  8. 05-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  9. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  11. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  12. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  13. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  16. 20-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  17. 10-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  18. 02-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  19. 19-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  20. 30-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  21. 18-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  22. 10-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  23. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 05-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 309/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.309/2025 This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) in a liquor prohibition case against Shanmugasundram. On October 16, 2021, police seized 110 liters of illicit liquor near Manjakkudi and arrested the accused, who allegedly had no authorization to possess it. The prosecution witness (a constable) testified about the seizure, arrest at 10:30 AM, and destruction of the contraband at 11:15 AM under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, Section 4(1)(aaa). During cross-examination, the defense disputed the timeline, legality of the arrest, and the witness's credibility, but the magistrate admitted the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case