STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs SHANMUGASUNDRAM — 309/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(aaa). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV150013702025
e-Filing Number
24-10-2025
Filing Number
1270/2025
Filing Date
05-11-2025
Registration No
309/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
21st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
1000
Police Station
KODAVASAL P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS
Respondent(s)
SHANMUGASUNDRAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C.309/2025 This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) in a liquor prohibition case against Shanmugasundram. On October 16, 2021, police seized 110 liters of illicit liquor near Manjakkudi and arrested the accused, who allegedly had no authorization to possess it. The prosecution witness (a constable) testified about the seizure, arrest at 10:30 AM, and destruction of the contraband at 11:15 AM under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, Section 4(1)(aaa). During cross-examination, the defense disputed the timeline, legality of the arrest, and the witness's credibility, but the magistrate admitted the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.309/2025 This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) in a liquor prohibition case against Shanmugasundram. On October 16, 2021, police seized 110 liters of illicit liquor near Manjakkudi and arrested the accused, who allegedly had no authorization to possess it. The prosecution witness (a constable) testified about the seizure, arrest at 10:30 AM, and destruction of the contraband at 11:15 AM under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, Section 4(1)(aaa). During cross-examination, the defense disputed the timeline, legality of the arrest, and the witness's credibility, but the magistrate admitted the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts