STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs MANJULA — 328/2025

Case under Tn Open Places(prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 Section 4(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTV150013502025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-10-2025

Filing Number

1250/2025

Filing Date

05-11-2025

Registration No

328/2025

Registration Date

14-11-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

317

Police Station

KODAVASAL P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

TN OPEN PLACES(PREVENTION OF DISFIGUREMENT) ACT, 1959 Section 4(1)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS

Respondent(s)

MANJULA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Judgement

26-03-2026

Judgement

24-03-2026

Evidence

17-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: STC 328/2025 Court Decision: The accused Manjula was acquitted and discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS from charges under Section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Erection of Flags and Banners on Roads Act (TNOPPD Act). Key Reasoning: The court found that while the prosecution presented two police witnesses (both police officials) who testified that a DMK party flag was erected without authorization in a public place on 30.03.2021, the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no independent civilian witnesses were produced, no physical evidence (photograph or site map) was submitted, and the flag itself was not presented in court. Relying solely on official witnesses who had direct stakes in the case created reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. The court applied the principle that when doubt exists, it must benefit the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC 328/2025 Court Decision: The accused Manjula was acquitted and discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS from charges under Section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Erection of Flags and Banners on Roads Act (TNOPPD Act). Key Reasoning: The court found that while the prosecution presented two police witnesses (both police officials) who testified that a DMK party flag was erected without authorization in a public place on 30.03.2021, the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no independent civilian witnesses were produced, no physical evidence (photograph or site map) was submitted, and the flag itself was not presented in court. Relying solely on official witnesses who had direct stakes in the case created reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. The court applied the principle that when doubt exists, it must benefit the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case