STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs MANJULA — 328/2025
Case under Tn Open Places(prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 Section 4(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV150013502025
e-Filing Number
15-10-2025
Filing Number
1250/2025
Filing Date
05-11-2025
Registration No
328/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
317
Police Station
KODAVASAL P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS
Respondent(s)
MANJULA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: STC 328/2025 Court Decision: The accused Manjula was acquitted and discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS from charges under Section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Erection of Flags and Banners on Roads Act (TNOPPD Act). Key Reasoning: The court found that while the prosecution presented two police witnesses (both police officials) who testified that a DMK party flag was erected without authorization in a public place on 30.03.2021, the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no independent civilian witnesses were produced, no physical evidence (photograph or site map) was submitted, and the flag itself was not presented in court. Relying solely on official witnesses who had direct stakes in the case created reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. The court applied the principle that when doubt exists, it must benefit the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: STC 328/2025 Court Decision: The accused Manjula was acquitted and discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS from charges under Section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Erection of Flags and Banners on Roads Act (TNOPPD Act). Key Reasoning: The court found that while the prosecution presented two police witnesses (both police officials) who testified that a DMK party flag was erected without authorization in a public place on 30.03.2021, the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no independent civilian witnesses were produced, no physical evidence (photograph or site map) was submitted, and the flag itself was not presented in court. Relying solely on official witnesses who had direct stakes in the case created reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. The court applied the principle that when doubt exists, it must benefit the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts