STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs RAJENDHIRAN — 14/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C) TNP ACT. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV150013222025
e-Filing Number
05-10-2025
Filing Number
1222/2025
Filing Date
05-11-2025
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. Selvam U
Respondent(s)
RAJENDHIRAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 21-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Magistrate court in Kodavasal acquitted C. Rajendiran of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing two bottles of Pondy Jeffries Brandy. The court found that while police witnesses testified to seizing the liquor, the prosecution failed to follow mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act, which requires samples to be taken and contraband destroyed in the presence of a senior police officer or prohibition officer with proper certification to the magistrate. Due to these procedural violations and lack of independent witnesses, the court held that reasonable doubt existed and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Magistrate court in Kodavasal acquitted C. Rajendiran of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing two bottles of Pondy Jeffries Brandy. The court found that while police witnesses testified to seizing the liquor, the prosecution failed to follow mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act, which requires samples to be taken and contraband destroyed in the presence of a senior police officer or prohibition officer with proper certification to the magistrate. Due to these procedural violations and lack of independent witnesses, the court held that reasonable doubt existed and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts