STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs MOHAN — 22/2026

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV150013172025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-10-2025

Filing Number

1217/2025

Filing Date

05-11-2025

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

23-01-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

ERAVANCHERY P.S

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Adv. Selvam U

Respondent(s)

MOHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Judgement

26-03-2026

Judgement

24-03-2026

Issue of Service

23-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused A. Mohan of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the police failed to comply with mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act, specifically that seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper documentary evidence, samples were not taken in the presence of a senior officer, and no certificates were forwarded to the magistrate as required by law. Given these procedural lapses and lack of independent witness corroboration, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and granted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused A. Mohan of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the police failed to comply with mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act, specifically that seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper documentary evidence, samples were not taken in the presence of a senior officer, and no certificates were forwarded to the magistrate as required by law. Given these procedural lapses and lack of independent witness corroboration, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and granted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case