STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs MOHAN — 22/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV150013172025
e-Filing Number
05-10-2025
Filing Number
1217/2025
Filing Date
05-11-2025
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
23-01-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
182
Police Station
ERAVANCHERY P.S
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. Selvam U
Respondent(s)
MOHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 23-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused A. Mohan of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the police failed to comply with mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act, specifically that seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper documentary evidence, samples were not taken in the presence of a senior officer, and no certificates were forwarded to the magistrate as required by law. Given these procedural lapses and lack of independent witness corroboration, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and granted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused A. Mohan of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the police failed to comply with mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act, specifically that seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper documentary evidence, samples were not taken in the presence of a senior officer, and no certificates were forwarded to the magistrate as required by law. Given these procedural lapses and lack of independent witness corroboration, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and granted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts