STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVANCHERY vs ANANTH — 24/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV150013002025
e-Filing Number
02-10-2025
Filing Number
1200/2025
Filing Date
05-Nov-2025
Registration No
24/2026
Registration Date
23-Jan-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
ERAVANCHERY P.S
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVANCHERY
Adv. Selvam U
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANANTH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Summary The court acquitted the accused S. Anandh of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 180ml of illicit brandy. The court found that the prosecution failed to follow mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act—specifically, the seizure and destruction of the liquor were not conducted in the presence of a Prohibition Officer or Police Inspector as required by law. Due to these procedural deficiencies and lack of independent witness testimony, the court held that reasonable doubt existed regarding the case and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
Questioning
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2026
Court Summary The court acquitted the accused S. Anandh of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 180ml of illicit brandy. The court found that the prosecution failed to follow mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act—specifically, the seizure and destruction of the liquor were not conducted in the presence of a Prohibition Officer or Police Inspector as required by law. Due to these procedural deficiencies and lack of independent witness testimony, the court held that reasonable doubt existed regarding the case and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts