Jansi vs Saradha — 91/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O 7 R 1,2. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV150010632025
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
97/2025
Filing Date
28-07-2025
Registration No
91/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jansi
Adv. S. Rajkumar
Respondent(s)
Saradha
Usha
Shanthi
Latha
Abirami
Kowsalya
Sambasivam
Dhanalakshmi
Priyadharshini
Minor Durgadevi
Minor Rajavel
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
For further Proceedings
Judgement
Arguments
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-04-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case 91/2025 Summary On April 10, 2026, the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kodavasal recorded the testimony of PW1 (Murugan, a 65-year-old farmer) in O.S. No. 91/2025 between petitioner Jansi and respondents Saradha, Usha, and Shanthi. The witness affirmed that his sworn statement was prepared with his advocate and acknowledged as correct. The case proceedings involved examination of the plaintiff's evidence under the Indian Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 91/2025 Summary On April 10, 2026, the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kodavasal recorded the testimony of PW1 (Murugan, a 65-year-old farmer) in O.S. No. 91/2025 between petitioner Jansi and respondents Saradha, Usha, and Shanthi. The witness affirmed that his sworn statement was prepared with his advocate and acknowledged as correct. The case proceedings involved examination of the plaintiff's evidence under the Indian Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts