STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs LOGANATHAN — 294/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 336, 427, 506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV150008932025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-07-2025

Filing Number

813/2025

Filing Date

04-04-2025

Registration No

294/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

820

Police Station

KODAVASAL P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 294(b), 336, 427, 506(1)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS

Respondent(s)

LOGANATHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

27-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Judgement

24-03-2026

Evidence

17-03-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 294/2025 The court acquitted all three accused (Loganathan, Aravinthan, and Masilamani) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 336, 427, and 506(2), applying the principle of benefit of doubt. The judge found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges through credible witness testimony, noting inconsistencies in evidence and insufficient corroboration of the allegations involving an altercation over a goat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Deposition
10-03-2026
Deposition
10-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 294/2025 The court acquitted all three accused (Loganathan, Aravinthan, and Masilamani) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 336, 427, and 506(2), applying the principle of benefit of doubt. The judge found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges through credible witness testimony, noting inconsistencies in evidence and insufficient corroboration of the allegations involving an altercation over a goat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case