STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs AARTHI — 91/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV150008272025
e-Filing Number
09-06-2025
Filing Number
748/2025
Filing Date
15-Jul-2025
Registration No
91/2025
Registration Date
15-Jul-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
187
Police Station
ERAVANCHERY P.S
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. Selvam U
Respondent(s)
-
1.AARTHI
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
22-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
15-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
This document is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) in Case C.C. No. 91/2025 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kodavasal, dated May 15, 2026. The prosecution witness testified regarding a hit-and-run accident on December 16, 2024, where a purple scooter struck his wife while she was hanging clothes by the roadside, causing her head and shoulder injuries requiring hospitalization across three medical facilities for approximately 20 days. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged the witness's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies including the 25-day delay in filing the complaint and suggesting the witness fabricated allegations to obtain compensation in a civil suit. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted it as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2025
This document is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) in Case C.C. No. 91/2025 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kodavasal, dated May 15, 2026. The prosecution witness testified regarding a hit-and-run accident on December 16, 2024, where a purple scooter struck his wife while she was hanging clothes by the roadside, causing her head and shoulder injuries requiring hospitalization across three medical facilities for approximately 20 days. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged the witness's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies including the 25-day delay in filing the complaint and suggesting the witness fabricated allegations to obtain compensation in a civil suit. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted it as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts