STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs JEGATHEESAN — 83/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 386,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV150008072025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-06-2025

Filing Number

728/2025

Filing Date

07-07-2025

Registration No

83/2025

Registration Date

09-07-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

212

Police Station

KODAVASAL P.S

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 386,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS

Respondent(s)

JEGATHEESAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

20-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Judgement

16-04-2026

Questioning

09-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court acquitted the accused Jegatheesan of charges under IPC sections 386 (extortion) and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The key witness (PW1) gave contradictory testimony that undermined the government's case, and the court determined insufficient credible evidence existed to convict despite witness testimony from the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

25-11-2025
Deposition
25-11-2025
Deposition
24-03-2026
Deposition
24-03-2026
Deposition
16-04-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Jegatheesan of charges under IPC sections 386 (extortion) and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The key witness (PW1) gave contradictory testimony that undermined the government's case, and the court determined insufficient credible evidence existed to convict despite witness testimony from the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case