STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs vignesh — 98/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),323,324,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV150006202025
e-Filing Number
26-04-2025
Filing Number
549/2025
Filing Date
28-May-2025
Registration No
98/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
176
Police Station
KODAVASAL P.S
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAVASAL PS
Respondent(s)
-
1.vignesh
-
2.maheshwaran
-
3.kalaiyarasan
-
4.muthuraman
-
5.viknesh
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
In Case C.C. No. 98/2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Kodavasal, witness P.W.6 (Mathankumar) testified on October 14, 2025, regarding an incident from May 27, 2024, involving a seized reaper stick and site inspection documents. A petition under Section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed. The witness testified that his signature did not appear on the inspection and seizure memos, and that police had not investigated the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
30-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2025
In Case C.C. No. 98/2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Kodavasal, witness P.W.6 (Mathankumar) testified on October 14, 2025, regarding an incident from May 27, 2024, involving a seized reaper stick and site inspection documents. A petition under Section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed. The witness testified that his signature did not appear on the inspection and seizure memos, and that police had not investigated the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts