STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs ANBHAZHAGAN — 231/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,341,270IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV150005232025
e-Filing Number
28-04-2025
Filing Number
457/2025
Filing Date
02-05-2025
Registration No
231/2025
Registration Date
24-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
493
Police Station
ERAVANCHERY P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. Selvam U
Respondent(s)
ANBHAZHAGAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Magistrate and Judicial Magistrate Court in Kodavasal acquitted four accused persons (Chandrahasan, Baskar, Nadarajan, and Rajendiran) charged under IPC sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 270 (negligence in handling disease) for a September 27, 2021 protest against agricultural and electricity bills. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient eyewitness testimony, contradictions in police evidence, and the absence of individual witnesses to establish the accused's participation. Under the benefit of doubt principle (CrPC 248(1)), the court discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Magistrate and Judicial Magistrate Court in Kodavasal acquitted four accused persons (Chandrahasan, Baskar, Nadarajan, and Rajendiran) charged under IPC sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 270 (negligence in handling disease) for a September 27, 2021 protest against agricultural and electricity bills. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient eyewitness testimony, contradictions in police evidence, and the absence of individual witnesses to establish the accused's participation. Under the benefit of doubt principle (CrPC 248(1)), the court discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts