Inspctor of Police Kudavasal vs Sivaprakasam — 81/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294 (b), 324, 506 (ii) IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV150000812024
Filing Number
81/2024
Filing Date
05-08-2023
Registration No
81/2024
Registration Date
05-08-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
15
Police Station
KODAVASAL P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspctor of Police Kudavasal
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sivaprakasam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 24-03-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 81/2024 Court Decision: The District Magistrate Court in Kodavasal acquitted accused T. Sivaprakasam of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged that Sivaprakasam abused two women and assaulted them with a stone on January 15, 2023, the court determined that the government witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and unreliable, with significant inconsistencies regarding their presence at the incident location and details of the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 81/2024 Court Decision: The District Magistrate Court in Kodavasal acquitted accused T. Sivaprakasam of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged that Sivaprakasam abused two women and assaulted them with a stone on January 15, 2023, the court determined that the government witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and unreliable, with significant inconsistencies regarding their presence at the incident location and details of the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts