Pradeeba vs Dhanabal — 282/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTV140015052023

Await Reports

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

846/2023

Filing Date

24-08-2023

Registration No

282/2023

Registration Date

31-08-2023

Court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi

Judge

4-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 140

Petitioner(s)

Pradeeba

Adv. Mr.M. Mahendran

Respondent(s)

Dhanabal

Ramalingam

Mathiyalagan

The United India Insurance co ltd

Adv. Mr.M.Ganesan

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge

16-04-2026

Await Reports

09-04-2026

Await Reports

12-03-2026

Await Reports

26-02-2026

Await Reports

12-02-2026

Await Reports

Interim Orders

13-03-2025
Deposition
27-03-2025
Deposition
03-07-2025
Deposition
12-08-2025
Deposition
28-08-2025
Deposition

Case Summary Case No: MCOP.282/2023 | Court: Subordinate Court, Thiruthuraipoondi | Date: 28.08.2025 This is a motor accident insurance claim matter where a witness (4th respondent, an insurance company employee) testified under oath regarding coverage of vehicles involved in a fatal accident. The court recorded the witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination by both the plaintiff and 2nd respondent, confirming that the deceased's two-wheeler was insured with the 2nd respondent's insurance company, making them liable for damages. No substantive order granting or dismissing the petition is stated in this document—it records only witness testimony proceedings in case MCOP.282/2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No: MCOP.282/2023 | Court: Subordinate Court, Thiruthuraipoondi | Date: 28.08.2025 This is a motor accident insurance claim matter where a witness (4th respondent, an insurance company employee) testified under oath regarding coverage of vehicles involved in a fatal accident. The court recorded the witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination by both the plaintiff and 2nd respondent, confirming that the deceased's two-wheeler was insured with the 2nd respondent's insurance company, making them liable for damages. No substantive order granting or dismissing the petition is stated in this document—it records only witness testimony proceedings in case MCOP.282/2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case