Therasammal vs Tamilnadu Transport Coparation ltd Thirunelveli Advocate - Thiru.S.udayakumar.,B.Sc.,B.L., — 278/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166, 140. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTV140014392023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
784/2023
Filing Date
28-07-2023
Registration No
278/2023
Registration Date
31-08-2023
Court
SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi
Judge
4-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Therasammal
Adv. R.S Jaisankar
Chimiyon
Respondent(s)
Tamilnadu Transport Coparation ltd Thirunelveli Advocate - Thiru.S.udayakumar.,B.Sc.,B.L.,
Rajendran
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination record (dated 26.06.2025) in case MCOP.278/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Thiruthuraipoondi, involving a fatal bus accident from 31.12.2022. The witness testified that his 80-year-old mother died in the accident near Keezhkuri caused by a government bus traveling eastward, and he transported her via 108 ambulance to Nagapattinam Government Hospital where she died. The witness confirmed seeking damages from the defendant and stated there was no re-examination. The court recorded the testimony as correct under the judge's supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination record (dated 26.06.2025) in case MCOP.278/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Thiruthuraipoondi, involving a fatal bus accident from 31.12.2022. The witness testified that his 80-year-old mother died in the accident near Keezhkuri caused by a government bus traveling eastward, and he transported her via 108 ambulance to Nagapattinam Government Hospital where she died. The witness confirmed seeking damages from the defendant and stated there was no re-examination. The court recorded the testimony as correct under the judge's supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts