Janaki vs Karnan — 109/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec 140. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Await Reports Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTV140008862023

Filing Number

432/2023

Filing Date

08-Mar-2020

Registration No

109/2023

Registration Date

13-Dec-2021

Court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi

Judge

4-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec 140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Janaki

    Adv. Thiru.N.S.Senthill kumar., B.Sc.B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karnan

  2. 2.TATA A.I.G Insurance Com., Ltd., Mumbai

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    This is a cross-examination statement in a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.109/2023) recorded by the Subordinate Judge at Thiruthuraipoondi on 21.08.2025. The 63-year-old plaintiff denies responsibility for the accident, claims the other vehicle driver was negligent and violated traffic rules, and asserts he suffered only minor injuries that have fully healed. No formal court order (bail, petition decision, or adjournment) is issued in this document—it records only the witness's testimony during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 07-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 31-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 11-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 01-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 19-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 02-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 24-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 17-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 03-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 21-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 11-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 25-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 10-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 29-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 17-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 20-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 10-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 23-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 13-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 28-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 19-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 09-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 12-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 05-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 29-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 25-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 02-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 17-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 04-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 18-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 08-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination statement in a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.109/2023) recorded by the Subordinate Judge at Thiruthuraipoondi on 21.08.2025. The 63-year-old plaintiff denies responsibility for the accident, claims the other vehicle driver was negligent and violated traffic rules, and asserts he suffered only minor injuries that have fully healed. No formal court order (bail, petition decision, or adjournment) is issued in this document—it records only the witness's testimony during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case