Mathiyazhagan vs S. Sheik Mansoor — 123/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 r 1. Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV140004522023

Filing Number

228/2023

Filing Date

20-Sep-2021

Registration No

123/2023

Registration Date

28-Oct-2021

Court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi

Judge

4-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 r 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mathiyazhagan

    Adv. Thiru.V.Arasu,B.A.,B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S. Sheik Mansoor

  2. 2.Sub Registrar, Tiruthuraipoondi

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 28-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 22-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 20-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 15-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 02-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 20-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 06-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 01-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 27-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS.123/2023 Mathiyazhagan v. S. Sheik Mansoor & Sub Registrar, Tiruthuraipoondi The Subordinate Court of Tiruthuraipoondi heard cross-examination of the first respondent on 27.06.2025. The court examined issues concerning property sale documentation, public authority powers, and registration procedures. The court held that: (1) the public authority document cannot be misused for personal benefit; (2) there is no connection between the property and the public authority document; (3) the respondent's rights over the property remain unaffected; and (4) Registration Act stamp duty provisions were properly followed. Further hearing is adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 04-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 10-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  48. 02-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  49. 15-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  50. 04-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  51. 24-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  52. 15-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  53. 26-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  54. 21-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  55. 10-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  56. 07-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  57. 08-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  58. 18-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  59. 02-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  60. 08-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  61. 07-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  62. 03-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  63. 18-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 20-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 123/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS.123/2023 Mathiyazhagan v. S. Sheik Mansoor & Sub Registrar, Tiruthuraipoondi The Subordinate Court of Tiruthuraipoondi heard cross-examination of the first respondent on 27.06.2025. The court examined issues concerning property sale documentation, public authority powers, and registration procedures. The court held that: (1) the public authority document cannot be misused for personal benefit; (2) there is no connection between the property and the public authority document; (3) the respondent's rights over the property remain unaffected; and (4) Registration Act stamp duty provisions were properly followed. Further hearing is adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case