chellamani vs CHITRA — 57/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTV140003062024

e-Filing Number

21-10-2024

Filing Number

227/2024

Filing Date

28-Oct-2024

Registration No

57/2024

Registration Date

15-Nov-2024

Court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi

Judge

4-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.chellamani

    Adv. SENTHIKUMAR V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHITRA

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    This is a witness examination order from the Subordinate Court, Thiruthuraipoondi (Case MCOP. 57/2024, dated April 16, 2026). The witness, a 49-year-old government employee, testified under oath regarding a traffic violation case (FIR 333/2023) involving unlicensed operation of a four-wheeler vehicle (TN 50 BV 0343) by the driver holding an invalid license (TN 50 Y 20230001256). The court recorded the witness's statement that the driver was not authorized to operate the four-wheeler and had no valid license for such vehicle operation; no cross-examination was conducted by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 30-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 16-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 15-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 12-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 04-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 28-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 12-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 31-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 11-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 01-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 21-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 16-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 30-Apr-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 17-Apr-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 27-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 13-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 04-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 17-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 29-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 17-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 16-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 15-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 28-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination order from the Subordinate Court, Thiruthuraipoondi (Case MCOP. 57/2024, dated April 16, 2026). The witness, a 49-year-old government employee, testified under oath regarding a traffic violation case (FIR 333/2023) involving unlicensed operation of a four-wheeler vehicle (TN 50 BV 0343) by the driver holding an invalid license (TN 50 Y 20230001256). The court recorded the witness's statement that the driver was not authorized to operate the four-wheeler and had no valid license for such vehicle operation; no cross-examination was conducted by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case