chellamani vs CHITRA — 57/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTV140003062024

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

21-10-2024

Filing Number

227/2024

Filing Date

28-10-2024

Registration No

57/2024

Registration Date

15-11-2024

Court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi

Judge

4-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166,140

Petitioner(s)

chellamani

Adv. SENTHIKUMAR V

Respondent(s)

CHITRA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge

24-04-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

04-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

30-10-2025
Deposition
13-11-2025
Deposition
16-04-2026
Deposition

This is a witness examination order from the Subordinate Court, Thiruthuraipoondi (Case MCOP. 57/2024, dated April 16, 2026). The witness, a 49-year-old government employee, testified under oath regarding a traffic violation case (FIR 333/2023) involving unlicensed operation of a four-wheeler vehicle (TN 50 BV 0343) by the driver holding an invalid license (TN 50 Y 20230001256). The court recorded the witness's statement that the driver was not authorized to operate the four-wheeler and had no valid license for such vehicle operation; no cross-examination was conducted by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination order from the Subordinate Court, Thiruthuraipoondi (Case MCOP. 57/2024, dated April 16, 2026). The witness, a 49-year-old government employee, testified under oath regarding a traffic violation case (FIR 333/2023) involving unlicensed operation of a four-wheeler vehicle (TN 50 BV 0343) by the driver holding an invalid license (TN 50 Y 20230001256). The court recorded the witness's statement that the driver was not authorized to operate the four-wheeler and had no valid license for such vehicle operation; no cross-examination was conducted by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case