Vaduvammal vs Rajendran — 55/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 1639A) 54. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTV140003042024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
22-10-2024
Filing Number
225/2024
Filing Date
28-10-2024
Registration No
55/2024
Registration Date
05-11-2024
Court
SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi
Judge
4-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaduvammal
Adv. Mohamed Umarhattapu G
Subramaniyan
Adv. Mohamed Umarhattapu G
Respondent(s)
Rajendran
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 30-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 25-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 12-03-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a motor accident compensation case (MCOP.55/2024) heard by the Subordinate Court at Thiruthuraipoondi on 24.04.2025. The second petitioner (father of the deceased) testified that his son died in a road accident, claiming Rs. 20 lakhs compensation from the respondents (vehicle owner and driver). The court found that the deceased son was negligent and primarily responsible for the accident by crossing the road carelessly, and rejected the petitioner's claims regarding the respondent driver's license and vehicle insurance compliance. The petition is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a motor accident compensation case (MCOP.55/2024) heard by the Subordinate Court at Thiruthuraipoondi on 24.04.2025. The second petitioner (father of the deceased) testified that his son died in a road accident, claiming Rs. 20 lakhs compensation from the respondents (vehicle owner and driver). The court found that the deceased son was negligent and primarily responsible for the accident by crossing the road carelessly, and rejected the petitioner's claims regarding the respondent driver's license and vehicle insurance compliance. The petition is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts