Baskaran vs Karthikeyan and 3 others — 65/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7, Rule1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV140001842025
Filing Number
196/2025
Filing Date
16-09-2025
Registration No
65/2025
Registration Date
16-09-2025
Court
SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi
Judge
4-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baskaran
Adv. Mr.P.Sasikumar
Respondent(s)
Karthikeyan and 3 others
Mahalakshmi
Vijayalakshmi
Sub-Register
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Judgement
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 65/2025: Baskaran v. Karthikeyan & Others Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of Baskaran (petitioner), declaring that the disputed property belongs to him and ordering the respondents to execute a corrective document to correct a typographical error in the original deed where survey number 211/1B2 was incorrectly recorded as 209/23. Key Reasoning: The court found that a 2001 gift deed from Baskaran's father-in-law clearly identified the property by its correct survey number and boundaries. Government revenue records and land surveyor reports confirmed the correct survey number. The error was a mere clerical mistake in transcription, not affecting ownership rights, as the property description, dimensions, and boundaries in the original deed were accurate and consistent with revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 65/2025: Baskaran v. Karthikeyan & Others Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of Baskaran (petitioner), declaring that the disputed property belongs to him and ordering the respondents to execute a corrective document to correct a typographical error in the original deed where survey number 211/1B2 was incorrectly recorded as 209/23. Key Reasoning: The court found that a 2001 gift deed from Baskaran's father-in-law clearly identified the property by its correct survey number and boundaries. Government revenue records and land surveyor reports confirmed the correct survey number. The error was a mere clerical mistake in transcription, not affecting ownership rights, as the property description, dimensions, and boundaries in the original deed were accurate and consistent with revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts