Baskaran vs Karthikeyan and 3 others — 65/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7, Rule1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 29th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV140001842025

Case disposed

Filing Number

196/2025

Filing Date

16-09-2025

Registration No

65/2025

Registration Date

16-09-2025

Court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi

Judge

4-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed with cost

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order7, Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Baskaran

Adv. Mr.P.Sasikumar

Respondent(s)

Karthikeyan and 3 others

Mahalakshmi

Vijayalakshmi

Sub-Register

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge

29-04-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

Judgement

22-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

10-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

27-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 65/2025: Baskaran v. Karthikeyan & Others Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of Baskaran (petitioner), declaring that the disputed property belongs to him and ordering the respondents to execute a corrective document to correct a typographical error in the original deed where survey number 211/1B2 was incorrectly recorded as 209/23. Key Reasoning: The court found that a 2001 gift deed from Baskaran's father-in-law clearly identified the property by its correct survey number and boundaries. Government revenue records and land surveyor reports confirmed the correct survey number. The error was a mere clerical mistake in transcription, not affecting ownership rights, as the property description, dimensions, and boundaries in the original deed were accurate and consistent with revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

26-02-2026
Deposition
22-04-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 65/2025: Baskaran v. Karthikeyan & Others Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of Baskaran (petitioner), declaring that the disputed property belongs to him and ordering the respondents to execute a corrective document to correct a typographical error in the original deed where survey number 211/1B2 was incorrectly recorded as 209/23. Key Reasoning: The court found that a 2001 gift deed from Baskaran's father-in-law clearly identified the property by its correct survey number and boundaries. Government revenue records and land surveyor reports confirmed the correct survey number. The error was a mere clerical mistake in transcription, not affecting ownership rights, as the property description, dimensions, and boundaries in the original deed were accurate and consistent with revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case