Baskaran vs Karthikeyan and 3 others — 65/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7, Rule1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV140001842025
Filing Number
196/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
65/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi
Judge
4-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baskaran
Adv. Mr.P.Sasikumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karthikeyan and 3 others
-
2.Mahalakshmi
-
3.Vijayalakshmi
-
4.Sub-Register
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 65/2025: Baskaran v. Karthikeyan & Others Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of Baskaran (petitioner), declaring that the disputed property belongs to him and ordering the respondents to execute a corrective document to correct a typographical error in the original deed where survey number 211/1B2 was incorrectly recorded as 209/23. Key Reasoning: The court found that a 2001 gift deed from Baskaran's father-in-law clearly identified the property by its correct survey number and boundaries. Government revenue records and land surveyor reports confirmed the correct survey number. The error was a mere clerical mistake in transcription, not affecting ownership rights, as the property description, dimensions, and boundaries in the original deed were accurate and consistent with revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2025
Summary of Case 65/2025: Baskaran v. Karthikeyan & Others Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of Baskaran (petitioner), declaring that the disputed property belongs to him and ordering the respondents to execute a corrective document to correct a typographical error in the original deed where survey number 211/1B2 was incorrectly recorded as 209/23. Key Reasoning: The court found that a 2001 gift deed from Baskaran's father-in-law clearly identified the property by its correct survey number and boundaries. Government revenue records and land surveyor reports confirmed the correct survey number. The error was a mere clerical mistake in transcription, not affecting ownership rights, as the property description, dimensions, and boundaries in the original deed were accurate and consistent with revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts