Duraimurugan vs M.Rajendran — 28/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 r 1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV140001512024
Filing Number
95/2024
Filing Date
24-Jun-2024
Registration No
28/2024
Registration Date
27-Jun-2024
Court
SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi
Judge
4-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Duraimurugan
Adv. Thiru.T.P.S.Manikannan., M.Com.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.M.Rajendran
-
2.R. kasthuri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Duraimurugan v. M. Rajendran and R. Kasthuri (28/2024) Decision: The court decreed the suit in favor of petitioner Duraimurugan, ordering defendants M. Rajendran and R. Kasthuri to pay Rs. 3,55,529 (principal of Rs. 3,00,000 plus interest) with 12% post-judgment interest until verdict date and 6% thereafter until payment. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendants validly executed a promissory note on 10.12.2022 acknowledging receipt of Rs. 3,00,000 as loan with agreed monthly interest. Under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, execution of a promissory note creates a presumption of consideration received, which the defendants failed to rebut with credible evidence. The court rejected defendants' contradictory claims about receiving money from a third party instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Await Reports
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Mediation
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Jun-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Lok Adalat
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Mar-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Lok Adalat
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Sep-2024
Lok Adalat
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Lok Adalat
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2024
Case Summary: Duraimurugan v. M. Rajendran and R. Kasthuri (28/2024) Decision: The court decreed the suit in favor of petitioner Duraimurugan, ordering defendants M. Rajendran and R. Kasthuri to pay Rs. 3,55,529 (principal of Rs. 3,00,000 plus interest) with 12% post-judgment interest until verdict date and 6% thereafter until payment. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendants validly executed a promissory note on 10.12.2022 acknowledging receipt of Rs. 3,00,000 as loan with agreed monthly interest. Under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, execution of a promissory note creates a presumption of consideration received, which the defendants failed to rebut with credible evidence. The court rejected defendants' contradictory claims about receiving money from a third party instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts