Sumathi vs A E Joseph — 21/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140 & 166,24(3). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTV140000792024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2024
Filing Number
37/2024
Filing Date
18-04-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
18-04-2024
Court
SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi
Judge
4-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sumathi
Adv. MUTHURAJA V
Deepika
Adv. MUTHURAJA V
Reshma
Adv. MUTHURAJA V
Respondent(s)
A E Joseph
The Divisional Manager
Adv. Thiru.T.P.S.Manikannan., M.Com.,B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Deposition
Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MCOP.21/2024) heard before the Subordinate Court of Thiruthuraipoondi on January 21, 2026. The case involves an insurance dispute regarding vehicle TN 50-AT-7660 (ECCO Private Car) and a motor accident claim. The court recorded witness testimonies from both the insurance company and the claimants regarding coverage under a Total Package Policy and liability for compensation. The case involves conflicting claims about whether the driver was under the influence of alcohol and whether the insurance company must pay damages, with the court recording evidence but no final judgment/order being issued in this document—this appears to be an evidentiary hearing record only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MCOP.21/2024) heard before the Subordinate Court of Thiruthuraipoondi on January 21, 2026. The case involves an insurance dispute regarding vehicle TN 50-AT-7660 (ECCO Private Car) and a motor accident claim. The court recorded witness testimonies from both the insurance company and the claimants regarding coverage under a Total Package Policy and liability for compensation. The case involves conflicting claims about whether the driver was under the influence of alcohol and whether the insurance company must pay damages, with the court recording evidence but no final judgment/order being issued in this document—this appears to be an evidentiary hearing record only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts