Murugaiyan vs Gowri — 8/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or 41 r 14. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th April 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNTV140000532024
Filing Number
21/2024
Filing Date
14-03-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
14-03-2024
Court
SubCourt, Thiruthuraipoondi
Judge
4-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murugaiyan
Adv. Mr.N.S.Senthilkumar
Respondent(s)
Gowri
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 8/2024 - Murugaiyan v. Gowri Court: Appellate Court, Tirupattur, Tamil Nadu Date: 7 April 2026 Key Decision The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment from 28 March 2017. The appellants were declared to have equal share (1/11 each) in the disputed property alongside other heirs of the deceased Ramachandran, contrary to their claim of 3/11 share. Core Issues The case involved partition of inherited properties between: - Plaintiffs: Murugaiyan and others (claiming 3/11 share) - Defendants: Gowri and others (claiming 1/11 share each) The properties were inherited from the deceased Ramachandran, who had multiple marriages and children from different wives. Main Finding The court found that under Hindu Succession Law, all legitimate heirs share equally in undivided ancestral property. The trial court correctly determined that both sets of heirs had equal claims to the property portions that remained undivided at the time of Ramachandran's death in 1997. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 8/2024 - Murugaiyan v. Gowri Court: Appellate Court, Tirupattur, Tamil Nadu Date: 7 April 2026 Key Decision The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment from 28 March 2017. The appellants were declared to have equal share (1/11 each) in the disputed property alongside other heirs of the deceased Ramachandran, contrary to their claim of 3/11 share. Core Issues The case involved partition of inherited properties between: - Plaintiffs: Murugaiyan and others (claiming 3/11 share) - Defendants: Gowri and others (claiming 1/11 share each) The properties were inherited from the deceased Ramachandran, who had multiple marriages and children from different wives. Main Finding The court found that under Hindu Succession Law, all legitimate heirs share equally in undivided ancestral property. The trial court correctly determined that both sets of heirs had equal claims to the property portions that remained undivided at the time of Ramachandran's death in 1997. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts