Inspector of Police, Kudavasal Police Station vs Praveen — 30/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 294(b), 324, 506(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV130004032023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
403/2023
Filing Date
13-06-2023
Registration No
30/2023
Registration Date
13-06-2023
Court
Additional Mahila Court at Magisterial level, Tiruvarur
Judge
10-Judicial Magistrate[Additional Mahila Court],Tiruvarur
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
KUDAVASAL P.S.,
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Kudavasal Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Praveen
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Judicial Magistrate[Additional Mahila Court],Tiruvarur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.No.30/2023 Court: Additional Women's Court (Judicial Magistrate), Tiruvarur Parties: Inspector of Police, Kudavasal Police Station (Petitioner) vs. Praveen (Respondent) Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the complainant's testimony regarding the alleged assault on February 18, 2023, was credible. The complainant testified that the respondent verbally abused her, then attacked her with a stick, causing injuries that required hospitalization. The respondent's cross-examination failed to substantially contradict the complainant's version of events. The court rejected the respondent's defense arguments that the case was fabricated or malicious, finding the charges of assault substantiated based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.No.30/2023 Court: Additional Women's Court (Judicial Magistrate), Tiruvarur Parties: Inspector of Police, Kudavasal Police Station (Petitioner) vs. Praveen (Respondent) Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the complainant's testimony regarding the alleged assault on February 18, 2023, was credible. The complainant testified that the respondent verbally abused her, then attacked her with a stick, causing injuries that required hospitalization. The respondent's cross-examination failed to substantially contradict the complainant's version of events. The court rejected the respondent's defense arguments that the case was fabricated or malicious, finding the charges of assault substantiated based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts