Inspector of Police, Kodavasal Police Station vs Rajkumar and one other — 25/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 294(b), 452, 323. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV130003652023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
365/2023
Filing Date
24-05-2023
Registration No
25/2023
Registration Date
26-05-2023
Court
Additional Mahila Court at Magisterial level, Tiruvarur
Judge
10-Judicial Magistrate[Additional Mahila Court],Tiruvarur
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
KUDAVASAL P.S.,
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Kodavasal Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajkumar and one other
Saranya
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Judicial Magistrate[Additional Mahila Court],Tiruvarur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
In this case (CC.No. 25/2023) before the Additional Mahila Court, Tiruvarur, a witness testified on May 22, 2024 regarding an incident from March 14, 2022. The witness (Gunasekaran, age 60) testified that he possessed a bag and placed it near his home after police inquired about it, but denied knowing who he had shared it with. The court permitted cross-examination of the prosecution witness after finding the government's case only partially supported, though no cross-examination by the defense was recorded. The witness statement was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In this case (CC.No. 25/2023) before the Additional Mahila Court, Tiruvarur, a witness testified on May 22, 2024 regarding an incident from March 14, 2022. The witness (Gunasekaran, age 60) testified that he possessed a bag and placed it near his home after police inquired about it, but denied knowing who he had shared it with. The court permitted cross-examination of the prosecution witness after finding the government's case only partially supported, though no cross-examination by the defense was recorded. The witness statement was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts