Inspector of Police AWPS, Tiruvarur vs Hariharsudhan — 14/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 498(A), 294(b), 323, 506(1), 420. Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV130000342022
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
34/2022
Filing Date
25-07-2022
Registration No
14/2022
Registration Date
25-07-2022
Court
Additional Mahila Court at Magisterial level, Tiruvarur
Judge
10-Judicial Magistrate[Additional Mahila Court],Tiruvarur
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
ALL WOMEN P.S. , TIRUVARUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police AWPS, Tiruvarur
Adv. THIRU. R. GOVIKKANNAN
Respondent(s)
Hariharsudhan
Jayamani
Vaijayanthimala
Jayasri
Jayabarathi
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Judicial Magistrate[Additional Mahila Court],Tiruvarur
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Service Pending |
| 15-05-2026 | Service Pending |
| 08-05-2026 | Service Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this criminal trial (Calendar Case 14/2022), the accused Hariharasudhan and four others filed a petition under Section 348 BNSS seeking to recall prosecution witnesses PW1 and PW4 for cross-examination, claiming important questions remained unanswered during their examination. The court found that both witnesses had already been elaborately cross-examined by the defence counsel on 01.08.2023 and 14.08.2024, fair opportunity was provided and utilized, and all material witnesses had been examined. The Additional Mahila Court dismissed the petition on 02.04.2025, finding no merit and concluding the petition was filed at the end of trial solely to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this criminal trial (Calendar Case 14/2022), the accused Hariharasudhan and four others filed a petition under Section 348 BNSS seeking to recall prosecution witnesses PW1 and PW4 for cross-examination, claiming important questions remained unanswered during their examination. The court found that both witnesses had already been elaborately cross-examined by the defence counsel on 01.08.2023 and 14.08.2024, fair opportunity was provided and utilized, and all material witnesses had been examined. The Additional Mahila Court dismissed the petition on 02.04.2025, finding no merit and concluding the petition was filed at the end of trial solely to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts