Inspector of police, Valangaiman ps vs SAKTHIVEL — 18/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV090010742024
e-Filing Number
08-11-2024
Filing Number
1027/2024
Filing Date
11-Nov-2024
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
12-Nov-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
316
Police Station
Valangaiman Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of police, Valangaiman ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAKTHIVEL
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
The court recorded depositions of witnesses (PW-8, PW-9, and PW-10) in case CC.18/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valangaiman on November 10, 2025. The witnesses testified regarding a fatal two-wheeler accident approximately one year prior where two individuals (Gopinath and Sathyaraj) died and another (Manikandan) was injured; their statements were recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code and formally acknowledged as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Apr-2025
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2025
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2025
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2024
Hearing on Sentence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2024
The court recorded depositions of witnesses (PW-8, PW-9, and PW-10) in case CC.18/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valangaiman on November 10, 2025. The witnesses testified regarding a fatal two-wheeler accident approximately one year prior where two individuals (Gopinath and Sathyaraj) died and another (Manikandan) was injured; their statements were recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code and formally acknowledged as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts