Sub Inspector Of Police vs SEENU — 81/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(b) 296(b)118(1)351(3). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV090005182025

e-Filing Number

17-08-2025

Filing Number

486/2025

Filing Date

23-Aug-2025

Registration No

81/2025

Registration Date

23-Sep-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

179

Police Station

Valangaiman Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(b) 296(b)118(1)351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector Of Police

    Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANGAIMAN PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SEENU

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 25-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 21-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 18-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 14-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.81/2025 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valangaiman Parties: Sub Inspector of Police (Petitioner) vs. Seenu (Respondent) Outcome: Witness deposition (PW-6) recorded and cross-examination completed. The court examined multiple witnesses including the police officer and medical personnel. The respondent's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the investigation—including a two-day delay in case registration without explanation, missing evidence documentation, and failure to examine hospital records or nearby witnesses. The case pertains to alleged criminal assault charges under BNS sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The proceeding records witness testimony and challenges to the prosecution's evidence before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 14-May-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 11-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 07-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 27-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 13-Mar-2026

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 07-Mar-2026

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 25-Feb-2026

    Copies

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 23-Jan-2026

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 05-Jan-2026

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 10-Dec-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 12-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 24-Oct-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 23-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 23-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.81/2025 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valangaiman Parties: Sub Inspector of Police (Petitioner) vs. Seenu (Respondent) Outcome: Witness deposition (PW-6) recorded and cross-examination completed. The court examined multiple witnesses including the police officer and medical personnel. The respondent's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the investigation—including a two-day delay in case registration without explanation, missing evidence documentation, and failure to examine hospital records or nearby witnesses. The case pertains to alleged criminal assault charges under BNS sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The proceeding records witness testimony and challenges to the prosecution's evidence before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case