Sub Inspector Of Police vs SEENU — 81/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(b) 296(b)118(1)351(3). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV090005182025

Arguments

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

17-08-2025

Filing Number

486/2025

Filing Date

23-08-2025

Registration No

81/2025

Registration Date

23-09-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

179

Police Station

Valangaiman Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(b) 296(b)118(1)351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police

Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANGAIMAN PS

Respondent(s)

SEENU

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

29-05-2026

Arguments

25-05-2026

Arguments

22-05-2026

Evidence

21-05-2026

Evidence

18-05-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-05-2026
Deposition
27-04-2026
Deposition
14-05-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: CC.81/2025 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valangaiman Parties: Sub Inspector of Police (Petitioner) vs. Seenu (Respondent) Outcome: Witness deposition (PW-6) recorded and cross-examination completed. The court examined multiple witnesses including the police officer and medical personnel. The respondent's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the investigation—including a two-day delay in case registration without explanation, missing evidence documentation, and failure to examine hospital records or nearby witnesses. The case pertains to alleged criminal assault charges under BNS sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The proceeding records witness testimony and challenges to the prosecution's evidence before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.81/2025 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valangaiman Parties: Sub Inspector of Police (Petitioner) vs. Seenu (Respondent) Outcome: Witness deposition (PW-6) recorded and cross-examination completed. The court examined multiple witnesses including the police officer and medical personnel. The respondent's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the investigation—including a two-day delay in case registration without explanation, missing evidence documentation, and failure to examine hospital records or nearby witnesses. The case pertains to alleged criminal assault charges under BNS sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The proceeding records witness testimony and challenges to the prosecution's evidence before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case