Sub Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps vs KABILAN — 17/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3),131. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV090002882025

e-Filing Number

11-04-2025

Filing Number

272/2025

Filing Date

02-May-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

02-May-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Conviction

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

Valangaiman Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3),131
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KABILAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Court Judgment The court acquitted two accused (Kabilan and Mukilan) of charges under BNS Section 296(b) (criminal intimidation), 351(3) (criminal intimidation to cause injury), and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, finding insufficient evidence. However, the court convicted both under BNS Section 131 (causing hurt by act endangering life/personal safety) based on witness testimony that they pushed/struck the complainant and her family members. They were sentenced to one year probation under the Good Conduct Bonds Act with a fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 01-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 30-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  32. 09-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 30-Jun-2025

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  34. 18-Jun-2025

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 10-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  36. 22-May-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  37. 02-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 02-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Judgment The court acquitted two accused (Kabilan and Mukilan) of charges under BNS Section 296(b) (criminal intimidation), 351(3) (criminal intimidation to cause injury), and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, finding insufficient evidence. However, the court convicted both under BNS Section 131 (causing hurt by act endangering life/personal safety) based on witness testimony that they pushed/struck the complainant and her family members. They were sentenced to one year probation under the Good Conduct Bonds Act with a fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case