Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps vs KAMAL — 14/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 196,131,351(3),49. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV090002642025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-04-2025

Filing Number

249/2025

Filing Date

28-04-2025

Registration No

14/2025

Registration Date

02-05-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

407

Police Station

Valangaiman Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 196,131,351(3),49

Petitioner(s)

Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

KAMAL

Vasu

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

27-04-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

Judgement

08-04-2026

Arguments

30-03-2026

Arguments

26-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Kamal and Vasu) of all charges under BNS sections 296(b), 131, and 351(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while witnesses testified about abusive language and altercations, the evidence was insufficient to establish the specific elements required for conviction, particularly regarding criminal intimidation and provocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

22-09-2025
Deposition
27-10-2025
Deposition
10-11-2025
Deposition
05-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Kamal and Vasu) of all charges under BNS sections 296(b), 131, and 351(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while witnesses testified about abusive language and altercations, the evidence was insufficient to establish the specific elements required for conviction, particularly regarding criminal intimidation and provocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case