Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps vs KAMAL — 14/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 196,131,351(3),49. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV090002642025

e-Filing Number

08-04-2025

Filing Number

249/2025

Filing Date

28-Apr-2025

Registration No

14/2025

Registration Date

02-May-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

407

Police Station

Valangaiman Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 196,131,351(3),49

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL

  2. 2.Vasu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Kamal and Vasu) of all charges under BNS sections 296(b), 131, and 351(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while witnesses testified about abusive language and altercations, the evidence was insufficient to establish the specific elements required for conviction, particularly regarding criminal intimidation and provocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 05-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 10-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 27-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  28. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 22-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  34. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 05-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  36. 30-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  37. 17-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  38. 08-Jul-2025

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  39. 01-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  40. 18-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  41. 10-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  42. 22-May-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  43. 02-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 28-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Kamal and Vasu) of all charges under BNS sections 296(b), 131, and 351(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while witnesses testified about abusive language and altercations, the evidence was insufficient to establish the specific elements required for conviction, particularly regarding criminal intimidation and provocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case