Subramanian vs Chinnapillai — 22/2020

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O.7.R.1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV090002582020

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

82/2020

Filing Date

18-11-2020

Registration No

22/2020

Registration Date

18-11-2020

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O.7.R.1

Petitioner(s)

Subramanian

Adv. Mr. B. Maheswaran, B.Sc, B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Chinnapillai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

29-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

13-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

20-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

11-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

05-08-2025
Deposition
19-08-2025
Deposition

Case 22/2020 Summary: This land dispute case before the District Civil and Criminal Court in Vellangani involved petitioner Subramanian (age 63) against respondent Chinnapillai regarding ownership of a 36-kuzhis agricultural property. Subramanian claimed the entire land belonged to him, while alleging Chinnapillai unlawfully encroached and operated a shop on 10 kuzhis on October 30, 2020. The court recorded PW1's (Subramanian's) testimony detailing the property's history through his family lineage and the alleged trespass incident. The judge accepted the witness statement and evidence as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 22/2020 Summary: This land dispute case before the District Civil and Criminal Court in Vellangani involved petitioner Subramanian (age 63) against respondent Chinnapillai regarding ownership of a 36-kuzhis agricultural property. Subramanian claimed the entire land belonged to him, while alleging Chinnapillai unlawfully encroached and operated a shop on 10 kuzhis on October 30, 2020. The court recorded PW1's (Subramanian's) testimony detailing the property's history through his family lineage and the alleged trespass incident. The judge accepted the witness statement and evidence as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case