Annai Prakash and 2 others vs Thirugnanasammandamoorthy and 8 others — 8/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV090001192019
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
23/2019
Filing Date
19-03-2019
Registration No
8/2019
Registration Date
20-03-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annai Prakash and 2 others
Adv. Thiru. B. Maheshwaran, B.Sc., B.L.,
Annai Prasath
Adv. Thiru. B. Maheshwaran, B.A., B.L.,
Annajothi
Adv. Thiru. B. Maheshwaran, B.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Thirugnanasammandamoorthy and 8 others
Ramamoorthy
Gurumoorthy
Kaliyaperumal
Masilamani
Gunaseelan
Subramaniyan
Boopathy
Murali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This document records the cross-examination of Defence Witness 3 (Selvaraj) in Case 8/2019 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Vellanganni, on February 11, 2026. The witness testified regarding disputed property possession, denying knowledge of survey numbers and clarifying that defendants are not his relatives, while maintaining that the Annai Prakash family has never possessed the southern property. The court accepted the witness testimony as credible and reliable under oath. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the cross-examination of Defence Witness 3 (Selvaraj) in Case 8/2019 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Vellanganni, on February 11, 2026. The witness testified regarding disputed property possession, denying knowledge of survey numbers and clarifying that defendants are not his relatives, while maintaining that the Annai Prakash family has never possessed the southern property. The court accepted the witness testimony as credible and reliable under oath. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts