Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps vs VIKNESH — 1/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,506(2),294(b). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV090000642025

e-Filing Number

04-01-2025

Filing Number

61/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

14-Feb-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,506(2),294(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector Of Police, Valangaiman ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKNESH

  2. 2.RAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District Criminal Court in Valangaiman acquitted two accused persons (Vignesh and Ravi) on April 27, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation) beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimony was contradictory and insufficient to establish guilt, particularly noting that the main complainant's testimony contradicted the government's case, and no corroborating independent witnesses were examined. Consequently, both accused were acquitted and released under section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 05-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 30-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 22-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  32. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  34. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 18-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  36. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  37. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  38. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  39. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  40. 26-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  41. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  42. 09-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  43. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  44. 28-May-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  45. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  46. 13-May-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  47. 09-May-2025

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  48. 28-Apr-2025

    Copies

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  49. 23-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  50. 08-Apr-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  51. 13-Mar-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  52. 14-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Criminal Court in Valangaiman acquitted two accused persons (Vignesh and Ravi) on April 27, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation) beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimony was contradictory and insufficient to establish guilt, particularly noting that the main complainant's testimony contradicted the government's case, and no corroborating independent witnesses were examined. Consequently, both accused were acquitted and released under section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case