Durgalakshmi vs Ayyappan — 2/2020

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7,Rule1,2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV090000402020

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

6/2020

Filing Date

31-01-2020

Registration No

2/2020

Registration Date

31-01-2020

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order7,Rule1,2

Petitioner(s)

Durgalakshmi

Adv. Thiru. N. Sankaran

Respondent(s)

Ayyappan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

24-04-2026

Evidence

10-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

04-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-08-2025
Deposition
23-09-2025
Deposition
25-02-2026
Deposition
10-04-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: Durgalakshmi vs. Ayyappan (Case 02/2020) The District Civil and Criminal Court at Walajahapeth heard this property dispute case on April 10, 2026. The court examined the cross-examination of the defendant Ayyappan regarding a disputed property. The court found that the defendant's testimony contradicted the plaintiff's claims about property possession, maintenance, and the 15-year period of adverse possession. The court determined that the explanatory evidence adequately supported the documentary evidence, and the case proceeded based on the evidence presented regarding the disputed property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Durgalakshmi vs. Ayyappan (Case 02/2020) The District Civil and Criminal Court at Walajahapeth heard this property dispute case on April 10, 2026. The court examined the cross-examination of the defendant Ayyappan regarding a disputed property. The court found that the defendant's testimony contradicted the plaintiff's claims about property possession, maintenance, and the 15-year period of adverse possession. The court determined that the explanatory evidence adequately supported the documentary evidence, and the case proceeded based on the evidence presented regarding the disputed property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valangaiman All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case