STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs GANESAN — 127/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 294(b),324,326. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV080041412024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-12-2024
Filing Number
4087/2024
Filing Date
26-12-2024
Registration No
127/2024
Registration Date
26-12-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
564
Police Station
NANNILAM P.S.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANNILAM PS
Respondent(s)
GANESAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC. No. 127/2024 This document records the deposition of witness P.W-6 in a criminal case before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam. The witness, a Special Assistant Investigator, testified about filing an FIR on 26.10.2023 under IPC sections 294(b) and 324 based on information received from Nannilam Government Hospital regarding an incident on 22.10.2023. The accused was absent during the hearing; a petition under section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed. No cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC. No. 127/2024 This document records the deposition of witness P.W-6 in a criminal case before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam. The witness, a Special Assistant Investigator, testified about filing an FIR on 26.10.2023 under IPC sections 294(b) and 324 based on information received from Nannilam Government Hospital regarding an incident on 22.10.2023. The accused was absent during the hearing; a petition under section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed. No cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts