INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANNILAM PS vs NAMACHIVAYAM — 117/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2)IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV080039082024

e-Filing Number

20-11-2024

Filing Number

3858/2024

Filing Date

20-Nov-2024

Registration No

117/2024

Registration Date

21-Nov-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

135

Police Station

NANNILAM P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2)IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANNILAM PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAMACHIVAYAM

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  3. 14-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court in Nannilam recorded depositions of two government witnesses (PW-5 and PW-6) in Case C.C. 117-2024 on March 17, 2026. Both witnesses retracted their earlier police statements, claiming they had no knowledge of the case and did not witness the alleged incident. The court permitted cross-examination of both witnesses by the prosecution under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act due to their failure to support the government's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  13. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  16. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  17. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  18. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  19. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  22. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  23. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  24. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  25. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  26. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  27. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  28. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  29. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  30. 25-Nov-2024

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  31. 21-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 20-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court in Nannilam recorded depositions of two government witnesses (PW-5 and PW-6) in Case C.C. 117-2024 on March 17, 2026. Both witnesses retracted their earlier police statements, claiming they had no knowledge of the case and did not witness the alleged incident. The court permitted cross-examination of both witnesses by the prosecution under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act due to their failure to support the government's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case