STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs SIVADEVAN — 90/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 379IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV080034662024
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
24-09-2024
Filing Number
3421/2024
Filing Date
03-10-2024
Registration No
90/2024
Registration Date
05-11-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
742
Police Station
PERALAM P.S.
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Respondent(s)
SIVADEVAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 90/2024 Summary This criminal case involves witness depositions (PW-4 through PW-7) recorded on 29 January 2025 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam. The case concerns a two-wheeler theft allegation, with witnesses testifying about a Pulsor motorcycle that went missing approximately four years prior, a police investigation, and the subsequent recovery of a vehicle (PY 3484) with the accused's alleged confession. All witnesses were examined-in-chief with no cross-examination by defence counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 90/2024 Summary This criminal case involves witness depositions (PW-4 through PW-7) recorded on 29 January 2025 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam. The case concerns a two-wheeler theft allegation, with witnesses testifying about a Pulsor motorcycle that went missing approximately four years prior, a police investigation, and the subsequent recovery of a vehicle (PY 3484) with the accused's alleged confession. All witnesses were examined-in-chief with no cross-examination by defence counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts