STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs PRABU — 757/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 294(b). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV080012852025
e-Filing Number
01-07-2025
Filing Number
1250/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
757/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
468
Police Station
PERALAM P.S.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Respondent(s)
PRABU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition (PW-2) in a criminal case (STC No. 757/2025) before the District Muncif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam. The witness, a 56-year-old Police Assistant Investigator, testified that he registered an FIR on 01.09.2023 under Section 294(b) IPC based on a complaint, investigated the case by visiting the scene, recording statements from six witnesses, and ultimately filed a charge sheet against the accused. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the investigation's legitimacy but the witness maintained that proper procedures were followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition (PW-2) in a criminal case (STC No. 757/2025) before the District Muncif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam. The witness, a 56-year-old Police Assistant Investigator, testified that he registered an FIR on 01.09.2023 under Section 294(b) IPC based on a complaint, investigated the case by visiting the scene, recording statements from six witnesses, and ultimately filed a charge sheet against the accused. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the investigation's legitimacy but the witness maintained that proper procedures were followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts