STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs ANBU — 672/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV080012722025
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
e-Filing Number
04-07-2025
Filing Number
1237/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
672/2025
Registration Date
24-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
259
Police Station
P.E.W P.S, TIRUVARUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE PEW NANNILAM PS
Respondent(s)
ANBU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.-1) in Case STC. 672/2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam. The witness, a police constable, testified about the arrest of the accused on 22.04.2022 for illegal possession of approximately 100 ml of country liquor bottles without government authorization, with seizure and destruction conducted under TNP Act Section 32. The accused was present during the deposition; no cross-examination was conducted by the defense, and the witness's testimony was recorded without re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.-1) in Case STC. 672/2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam. The witness, a police constable, testified about the arrest of the accused on 22.04.2022 for illegal possession of approximately 100 ml of country liquor bottles without government authorization, with seizure and destruction conducted under TNP Act Section 32. The accused was present during the deposition; no cross-examination was conducted by the defense, and the witness's testimony was recorded without re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts