STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs RAJAMANI — 270/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(aaa)TNPACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV080011682025

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2025

Filing Number

1138/2025

Filing Date

03-07-2025

Registration No

270/2025

Registration Date

25-09-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

288

Police Station

PERALAM P.S.

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(aaa)TNPACT

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Respondent(s)

RAJAMANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

21-05-2026

Evidence

06-05-2026

Evidence

27-04-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
Deposition

This is a witness deposition document (not a final judgment/order), not a case outcome. The prosecution witness (P.W. 1), a head constable from Nidamangalam Police Station, testified on January 22, 2026, regarding the seizure of approximately 110 liters of illicit liquor under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act on July 3, 2018. The witness described the arrest procedure, seizure documentation, and destruction of contraband; cross-examination by the defense challenged the credibility of the witness and the legality of the procedures followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness deposition document (not a final judgment/order), not a case outcome. The prosecution witness (P.W. 1), a head constable from Nidamangalam Police Station, testified on January 22, 2026, regarding the seizure of approximately 110 liters of illicit liquor under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act on July 3, 2018. The witness described the arrest procedure, seizure documentation, and destruction of contraband; cross-examination by the defense challenged the credibility of the witness and the legality of the procedures followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case