STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERALAM vs KANNAN — 64/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)BNS. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV080005412025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-03-2025
Filing Number
522/2025
Filing Date
21-03-2025
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
24-03-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
623
Police Station
PERALAM P.S.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERALAM
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Respondent(s)
KANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document contains depositions of two witnesses (P.W-4 and P.W-5) recorded on May 29, 2025, before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam in Case CC.No.64/2025. A petition under section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed in both depositions. The witnesses testified regarding an altercation on October 29-30, 2024, involving two accused persons who allegedly assaulted the witness's family members with sticks, causing injuries, and made threats. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document contains depositions of two witnesses (P.W-4 and P.W-5) recorded on May 29, 2025, before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam in Case CC.No.64/2025. A petition under section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed in both depositions. The witnesses testified regarding an altercation on October 29-30, 2024, involving two accused persons who allegedly assaulted the witness's family members with sticks, causing injuries, and made threats. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts