STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs SANKAR — 205/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 324(2)BNS. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV080005232025
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2025
Filing Number
505/2025
Filing Date
17-03-2025
Registration No
205/2025
Registration Date
18-03-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
294
Police Station
NANNILAM P.S.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANNILAM PS
Respondent(s)
SANKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document records the deposition of Witness PW-2 (Priya, age 45) in case S.T.C No. 205/2025 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam, on March 12, 2026. The witness testified that on September 27, 2024, the accused cut wires at her residence, requiring ₹26,500 for repairs, leading to a police complaint filed by her husband. During cross-examination, the witness provided inconsistent statements regarding her presence at the incident location and contradicted earlier claims about the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document records the deposition of Witness PW-2 (Priya, age 45) in case S.T.C No. 205/2025 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam, on March 12, 2026. The witness testified that on September 27, 2024, the accused cut wires at her residence, requiring ₹26,500 for repairs, leading to a police complaint filed by her husband. During cross-examination, the witness provided inconsistent statements regarding her presence at the incident location and contradicted earlier claims about the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts