STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANNILAM vs SRINIVASAN — 2/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),131,351(2)BNS@296(b),131,351(2),132BNS. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 29th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV080000122025
e-Filing Number
04-01-2025
Filing Number
10/2025
Filing Date
06-01-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
06-01-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
FIR Details
FIR Number
359
Police Station
NANNILAM P.S.
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANNILAM
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANNILAM PS
Respondent(s)
SRINIVASAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition, not a final court judgment. It records the testimony of Vijayakumar (PW-5), a restaurant worker, who initially claimed limited knowledge of an incident on 30.12.2024 but later admitted during cross-examination by the prosecution that he witnessed the accused (Srinivasan) abusing a restaurant owner and a female police officer, physically assaulting the officer, and making threats—contradicting his initial statement to police. The defense counsel declined cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition, not a final court judgment. It records the testimony of Vijayakumar (PW-5), a restaurant worker, who initially claimed limited knowledge of an incident on 30.12.2024 but later admitted during cross-examination by the prosecution that he witnessed the accused (Srinivasan) abusing a restaurant owner and a female police officer, physically assaulting the officer, and making threats—contradicting his initial statement to police. The defense counsel declined cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts