Mangaiyarkarasi vs Mukeshmurthy — 61/2024
Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18(e), 19(8). Status: Counter. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
DVC - Domestic Violence Case
CNR: TNTV070089752024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
8971/2024
Filing Date
07-11-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
07-11-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mangaiyarkarasi
Adv. Thiru.S.Sathish Kumar
Respondent(s)
Mukeshmurthy
Moorthy
Sundhari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I
Counter
Counter
Counter
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Counter |
| 18-05-2026 | Counter |
| 11-05-2026 | Counter |
| 07-05-2026 | Counter |
| 05-05-2026 | Counter |
Interim Orders
Case 61/2024 Summary In this domestic violence case (DVC No. 61/2024) before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Mannargudi, the first witness (P.W. 1), a 60-year-old woman named Chandra, testified on June 18, 2025 under oath regarding allegations under IPC Sections 18(e) and 19(8). The witness, appearing as the mother of the complainant Mangaiyarkarasi, provided evidence including bank documents showing 80 pounds of gold and 659.270 grams of gold allegedly belonging to her son, along with certified copies of power of attorney and bank account details. The court recorded her deposition and accepted her testimony as truthful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 61/2024 Summary In this domestic violence case (DVC No. 61/2024) before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Mannargudi, the first witness (P.W. 1), a 60-year-old woman named Chandra, testified on June 18, 2025 under oath regarding allegations under IPC Sections 18(e) and 19(8). The witness, appearing as the mother of the complainant Mangaiyarkarasi, provided evidence including bank documents showing 80 pounds of gold and 659.270 grams of gold allegedly belonging to her son, along with certified copies of power of attorney and bank account details. The court recorded her deposition and accepted her testimony as truthful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts