STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs BHARATHIRAJA — 172/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Trial Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV070088642024

e-Filing Number

07-08-2024

Filing Number

8860/2024

Filing Date

24-Oct-2024

Registration No

172/2024

Registration Date

24-Oct-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate II

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

KOTTUR P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTUR PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATHIRAJA

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate II

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    This document records witness depositions in Case 172/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II at Mannargudi, involving the State of Tamil Nadu (represented by Inspector of Police) versus Bharathiraja. The case concerns a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 07.03.2024 at 7:30 PM involving a two-wheeler (TN50 L7971) and an Enfield Bullet motorcycle (TN50 AW3319), resulting in injuries to multiple persons including one fatality (Mahendran). Two witnesses testified on 17.11.2025: Palaniyappan (PW4) stated he did not witness the accident but heard about it secondhand, while Pugazhenthi (PW5) provided signature evidence as a bystander at the scene. Both witnesses' testimony was subject to cross-examination by the respondent's counsel regarding the accuracy and circumstances of their statements to police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  14. 12-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate II

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate II

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate II

  18. 24-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate II

  19. 02-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate II

  20. 11-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate II

  21. 23-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate II

  22. 05-Jun-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate II

  23. 19-May-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate II

  24. 08-May-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate II

  25. 28-Mar-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate II

  26. 13-Feb-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate II

  27. 10-Jan-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate II

  28. 05-Dec-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate II

  29. 24-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 24-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness depositions in Case 172/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II at Mannargudi, involving the State of Tamil Nadu (represented by Inspector of Police) versus Bharathiraja. The case concerns a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 07.03.2024 at 7:30 PM involving a two-wheeler (TN50 L7971) and an Enfield Bullet motorcycle (TN50 AW3319), resulting in injuries to multiple persons including one fatality (Mahendran). Two witnesses testified on 17.11.2025: Palaniyappan (PW4) stated he did not witness the accident but heard about it secondhand, while Pugazhenthi (PW5) provided signature evidence as a bystander at the scene. Both witnesses' testimony was subject to cross-examination by the respondent's counsel regarding the accuracy and circumstances of their statements to police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case