Forest Officer vs Amaran — 74/2023
Case under Forest Act, 1927 Section 9,39 (1),(2),50 1(b),1(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV070081772022
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
Filing Number
8177/2022
Filing Date
29-11-2022
Registration No
74/2023
Registration Date
15-03-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
FOREST RANGE, MANNARGUDI
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Forest Officer
Adv. APP Gr.II
Respondent(s)
Amaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 02-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document contains witness depositions (Chapter XXV BNSS) in Criminal Case No. 74/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Mannargudi, Tamil Nadu. The depositions record the testimonies of two witnesses regarding an incident on 21.06.2022 involving the alleged use of a catapult (gun) to injure a porcupine in Kizhvalendamicheri village, with the accused identified as Arulmozhi Venkaiyan. The witnesses (a village administrator and a forest officer) provided their accounts during examination-in-chief and cross-examination, documenting procedural details, evidence collection (including confessional statements and site plans marked as Exhibits), and details about the accused's custody and investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains witness depositions (Chapter XXV BNSS) in Criminal Case No. 74/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Mannargudi, Tamil Nadu. The depositions record the testimonies of two witnesses regarding an incident on 21.06.2022 involving the alleged use of a catapult (gun) to injure a porcupine in Kizhvalendamicheri village, with the accused identified as Arulmozhi Venkaiyan. The witnesses (a village administrator and a forest officer) provided their accounts during examination-in-chief and cross-examination, documenting procedural details, evidence collection (including confessional statements and site plans marked as Exhibits), and details about the accused's custody and investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts